On December 1, 2023, the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) carried out a second targeted attack on the Baikal-Amur railway line, underscoring its calculated approach to disrupting Russian transportation networks. The recent assault, strategically executed at the “Chortov Most” viaduct, adds a new dimension to the already tense situation following the initial strike in the Severomuysky Tunnel.
The Chortov Most Operation
The SBU, in a meticulously planned move, exploited the rerouting of Russian trains through the Northern Bypass after the Severomuysky Tunnel attack. The explosives-rigged on the 35-meter high “Devil’s Bridge” were triggered precisely as a train traversed it, resulting in the destruction of four fuel tankers and inflicting damages on two more due to the ensuing fire. The scale of destruction, corroborated by Russian social media, emphasizes the strategic impact on the Baikal-Amur railway line.
The impact of the SBU’s operations extends beyond mere geographical proximity, reaching regions like Buryatia. Fuel spillage over a significant area of 150 square meters adds an environmental dimension to an already volatile situation. The SBU’s ability to strike at the heart of Russian transportation networks raises questions about the efficacy of Russian security measures and the vulnerability of critical infrastructure.
Russian Telegram channels report that on November 30, saboteurs blew up a freight train in Buryatia at the Itykit-Okusikan crossing, which consisted of 50 train cars, including 41 tank cars with diesel and 3 tank cars with aviation fuel.
Further transportation of the cars is… https://t.co/d4icUgMZi4 pic.twitter.com/8rqlkALnQl
— Anton Gerashchenko (@Gerashchenko_en) December 1, 2023Severomuysky Tunnel and Beyond
This recent development follows a previous attack on the Severomuysky Tunnel, a vital part of the Baikal-Amur Mainline. The SBU’s repeated success in targeting crucial transportation routes emphasizes the need for a robust review of Russian security measures. The ability of the SBU to strike at the core of Russian transportation networks raises questions about the efficacy of Russian security measures and the vulnerability of critical infrastructure.
More Read
Ukraine’s clandestine strike has prompted Russian authorities to open a criminal case, acknowledging the severity of the attack. The Severomuysky tunnel, a critical railway connection between Russia and China, is now paralyzed, disrupting civilian and military supply transport. The SBU’s covert operations challenge the perceived security of Russia’s key infrastructure links, posing significant geopolitical challenges.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
-
Has the SBU claimed responsibility for the attacks?
As of now, the SBU has not publicly confirmed its involvement in the attacks on the Baikal-Amur railway line. The covert nature of the operations leaves room for speculation about the extent of Ukrainian infiltration and the SBU’s capabilities.
-
What is the environmental impact of the attacks?
The spillage of fuel over a 150-square-meter area in Buryatia, coupled with the destruction of fuel tankers, adds an environmental dimension to the situation. The long-term consequences of these environmental impacts remain uncertain.
-
How has Russia responded to the attacks?
Russia has not officially confirmed the sabotage, but opening a criminal case indicates the seriousness with which the government is treating the attacks. The Russian state railroad company RZHD has provided a statement downplaying the impact on train movements.
-
What are the potential repercussions of these targeted assaults?
As geopolitical tensions continue to escalate, the implications of these targeted assaults on crucial transportation routes may have far-reaching consequences. The vulnerability of critical infrastructure, as demonstrated by the SBU’s operations, raises concerns about the overall security landscape in the region.
